MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Granval G. Hunter appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Hunter contends that his time-barred habeas petition should be addressed on the merits because he is actually innocent of the conduct used to enhance his sentence. Because Hunter has failed to present any evidence of his innocence, the district court did not err by dismissing his petition. See Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 316-17, 115 S.Ct. 851, 130 L.Ed.2d 808 (1995).

AFFIRMED.