MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Christopher D. Zurcher appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Zurcher contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object, based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, *551 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), to the imposition of an upward departure from the presumptive sentence under the Oregon Sentencing Guidelines based upon judge-found facts. Because Zurcher has failed to demonstrate prejudice from any alleged error, the Oregon court’s rejection of this claim was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

AFFIRMED.