U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Issam Mansour v. Cal-western Reconveyance Corp.

Issam Mansour v. Cal-western Reconveyance Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2010
Issam Mansour v. Cal-western Reconveyance Corp.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 17 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISSAM MANSOUR, No. 09-16778

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00037-DGC v.

MEMORANDUM * CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORP.; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 25, 2010 **

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Issam Mansour appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action concerning foreclosure proceedings initiated by defendants. We have

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Seinfeld v. Bartz, 322 F.3d 693, 696 (9th Cir. 2003), and we review for an abuse of discretion a denial of a motion to alter or amend a judgment, Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993).

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders entered on April 21, 2009, and July 15, 2009.

AFFIRMED.

2 09-16778

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Mansour’s request for oral argument is denied.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.