U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Issam Mansour v. Cal-western Reconveyance Corp.

Issam Mansour v. Cal-western Reconveyance Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 17, 2010

Issam Mansour v. Cal-western Reconveyance Corp.

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 17 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ISSAM MANSOUR, No. 09-16778 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00037-DGC v. MEMORANDUM * CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORP.; et al., Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 25, 2010 **

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Issam Mansour appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action concerning foreclosure proceedings initiated by defendants. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Mansour’s request for oral argument is denied. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Seinfeld v. Bartz, 322 F.3d 693, 696 (9th Cir. 2003), and we review for an abuse of discretion a denial of a motion to alter or amend a judgment, Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993).

We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders entered on April 21, 2009, and July 15, 2009.

AFFIRMED.

2 09-16778

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.