U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Kimble v. Holder

Kimble v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2010 · Alarcón, Leavy, Graber
386 F. App'x 712

Kimble v. Holder

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Kimble, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions from a United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement decision to reinstate her prior exclusion order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. *713 § 1252. We review de novo questions of law and due process claims. Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t Homeland Security, 539 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The reinstatement of Kimble’s removal order did not violate her due process rights. See Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486 F.3d 484, 497 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (“Reinstatement of a prior removal order — regardless of the process afforded in the underlying order — does not offend due process because reinstatement of a prior order does not change the alien’s rights or remedies.”).

Kimble’s remaining constitutional contentions are not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.