MEMORANDUM **

Harishchander Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reissue a previous decision. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2008), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not act arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law by concluding that counsel’s affidavit of non-receipt was insufficient to rebut the presumption of effective service. Cf. Singh v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 1170, 1172 (9th Cir. 2007) (statutory duty of service fulfilled when BIA mails decision to petitioner’s or his counsel’s address of record); see Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational or contrary to law.”).

*721 Singh’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.