U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Fausto Fabian

United States v. Fausto Fabian
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 21, 2010
388 F. App'x 726
United States v. Fausto Fabian

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 21 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10424 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-01082-FRZ v. MEMORANDUM * FAUSTO ANTONIO FABIAN, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 29, 2010 ** Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Fausto Antonio Fabian appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 48- month sentence for reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Fabians’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief of answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 09-10424

* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.