MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Rondell L. Webb appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Webb contends that the district court erred in dismissing as untimely his petition challenging denial of parole. The district court found the petition untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, and also determined that various claims asserted by Webb were procedurally defaulted, unexhausted, challenges to the application of state law not cognizable on federal habeas review. We may affirm on any ground supported by the record. See Buckley v. Terhune, 441 F.3d 688, 694 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc).

The statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) began to run on January 10, 2002, the day Webb’s time to file an administrative appeal lapsed and the challenged decision became final. See Redd v. McGrath, 343 F.3d 1077, 1082-85 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, his federal habeas petition, signed and presumably submitted to prison officials for mailing on February 2, 2005, was untimely.

AFFIRMED.