U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Richard Hellman

United States v. Richard Hellman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 4, 2010

United States v. Richard Hellman

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 04 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-50173 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00754-RMT-1 v. MEMORANDUM* RICHARD LEE HELLMAN, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Robert M. Takasugi, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 2, 2010** Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT, Circuit Judge and WHYTE, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. page 2 The government failed to object below and hasn’t shown a “reasonable probability that [Hellman] would have received a different sentence but for the district court’s error.” United States v. Gonzalez-Zotelo, 556 F.3d 736, 741 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.