MEMORANDUM **

Rafael Arevalo-Orozco, a native a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the *542 Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, and review de novo questions of law and constitutional claims. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Arevalo-Orozco’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to specify an error in the BIA’s underlying order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1). Contrary to his contention, Arevalo-Orozco is ineligible for relief under former section 212(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (repealed 1996), because his ground of removability lacks a statutory counterpart in a ground of inadmissibility. See 8 C.F.R. § 1212.3(f)(5); Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1207 & 1208 n. 7 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Arevalo-Orozco’s remaining legal and constitutional challenges to the BIA’s determination that he is ineligible for section 212(c) relief are unavailing. See Abebe, 554 F.3d at 1207 & 1208 n. 7.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.