MEMORANDUM **

Brett Hahn appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed following remand for re-sentencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Hahn contends the district court procedurally erred when it imposed a consecutive sentence on remand without giving him credit for the 902 days he served in state custody. The district court’s decision to depart from section 5G1.3(b) of the Sentencing Guidelines by imposing a consecutive sentence obviated the requirement that Hahn be granted credit for time spent in state custody under section 5G1.3(b)(l). Moreover, the district court’s explanation for its sentence was sufficient to allow for meaningful appellate review. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 356-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-92, 995 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Hahn’s motion to expedite appellate review is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.