U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Yuri Deleon-Archila

United States v. Yuri Deleon-Archila
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2010
394 F. App'x 403

United States v. Yuri Deleon-Archila

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 02 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10407 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00084-RLH v. MEMORANDUM * YURI SAUL DELEON-ARCHILA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted August 23, 2010 ** Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Yuri Saul Deleon-Archila appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Deleon-Archila contends that the district court procedurally erred at sentencing by failing to: 1) fully address his non-frivolous arguments in support of a lower sentence; 2) adequately explain the sentence imposed; and 3) consider all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Deleon-Archila also contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. The record reflects that the district court considered Deleon-Archila’s arguments and did not otherwise procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93, 995 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence is substantively reasonable.

See id. at 993.

Deleon-Archila’s contention that his sentence violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because his prior convictions were neither admitted, nor established by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, is foreclosed. See United States v. Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1197 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

2 09-10407

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.