Payne v. Peninsula School Dist.
Payne v. Peninsula School Dist.
621 F.3d 1001
(Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Payne v. Peninsula School Dist.
Opinion
Windy PAYNE, individually and as guardian on behalf of; D.P., a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Artondale Elementary School, a municipal corporation; Jodi Coy, in her individual *1002 and official capacity; James Coolican, in his individual and official capacity; Jane Does 1-10; John Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Thomas Brian Vertelis, Esquire, Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson & Daheim, LLP, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Donald F. Austin, Esquire, Michael A. Patterson, Esquire, Patterson Buchanan Fobes Leitch & Kalzer, Inc., PS, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.
Prior report: 598 F.3d 1123.
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.