MEMORANDUM **

Felipe Almanza appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for sentence reduction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Almanza contends that the district court erred by imposing a substantively unreasonable sentence, failing to consider all the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors to impose an *375 individualized sentence, and treating the Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory. These contentions are foreclosed. See Dillon v. United States, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 2691-93, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010).

AFFIRMED.