United States v. Alejandro Solorio-Cadena
United States v. Alejandro Solorio-Cadena
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 07 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10316 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00359-GMS v. MEMORANDUM * ALEJANDRO SOLORIO-CADENA, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 23, 2010 ** Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Alejandro Solorio-Cadena appeals from his 46-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Solorio-Cadena’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 09-10316
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.