Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

United States v. Vernon Louisville, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Vernon Louisville, Jr., 398 F. App'x 181 (9th Cir. 2010)
Silverman, Callahan, Smith

United States v. Vernon Louisville, Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Vernon Alvin Louisville, Jr. appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Louisville contends his sentence does not reflect the reduction provided for in Amendment 706 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The district court properly denied the motion on the ground that Louisville had already received the benefit of the Guidelines amendment as he pleaded guilty and was sentenced after the amendment went into effect.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernon Alvin LOUISVILLE, Jr., Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished
↑