FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10403

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:03-CR-00375 v.

MEMORANDUM * JAMES DOUGLAS SHERIFFS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010 ** Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

James Douglas Sheriffs appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a six-month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sheriffs’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Sheriffs has filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 08-10403