MEMORANDUM **

Luis Manuel Ochoa-Contreras and Marisol Ochoa, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and de novo claims of due process violations, Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir. 2001). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen because the BIA considered the evidence of petitioners’ U.S. citizen son and daughter’s medical conditions and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to establish pri-ma facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, *414 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law”). Petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed to consider the cumulative impact of their hardship evidence fails because it is not supported by the record.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.