MEMORANDUM **

Medora Nanoff appeals from the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduced sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Nanoff contends that the district court erred by failing to lower her sentence in light of Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. This contention fails because NanofPs sentence was based on a mandatory minimum. See United States v. Jackson, 577 F.3d 1032, 1034-35 (9th Cir. 2009). Nanoffs arguments that her case is distinguishable from Jackson and that United States v. Auld, 321 F.3d 861 (9th Cir. 2003), has been overruled are also without merit. See Jackson, 577 F.3d at 1034-35.

AFFIRMED.