United States v. Dewayne Donelson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Dewayne Donelson

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50020

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 09-cr-00502-ODW v.

MEMORANDUM * DEWAYNE DONELSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Otis D. Wright, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010 ** Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The United States of America appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed on Dewayne Donelson following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of at least five grams of cocaine in the form of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(iii). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate and remand for re-sentencing.

The government contends that the district court erred when it imposed a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum after considering disparities in sentences for offenses involving crack and powder cocaine. “Congress intended not to disturb statutory minimums through the application of the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors.” See United States v. Wipf, No. 09-50291, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18167, at *7 (August 31, 2010). Because the district court based the sentence on a factor set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), rather than subsections (e) or (f), we vacate and remand for re-sentencing.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 10-50020

Reference

Status
Unpublished