United States v. Isaid Herrera
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Isaid Herrera appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Herrera contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). Moreover, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See id.
AFFIRMED.
**
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isaid HERRERA, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished