MEMORANDUM **

Theron N. Lynch, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the abstract of judgment for his sentence is incorrect and requires him to serve his full sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action as Hee/c-barred because a judgment in Lynch’s favor “would necessarily imply the invalidity of his ... sentence,” and Lynch has not demonstrated that his sentence has already been invalidated. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

AFFIRMED.