U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Tammy Berdeaux v. Susan Manning

Tammy Berdeaux v. Susan Manning
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 6, 2010 · Silverman, Callahan, Smith
399 F. App'x 222

Tammy Berdeaux v. Susan Manning

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Tammy Berdeaux appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of jurisdiction her action arising from her participation in a Masters in Education program through the University of Wisconsin-Stout. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy, 453 F.3d 1151, 1154 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Berdeaux failed to establish that the court had personal jurisdiction over defendants. See Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 800, 802-03 (9th Cir. 2004) (stating that “the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that jurisdiction is appropriate,” and setting forth test for specific personal jurisdiction).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.