Tammy Berdeaux v. Susan Manning
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Tammy Berdeaux appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of jurisdiction her action arising from her participation in a Masters in Education program through the University of Wisconsin-Stout. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy, 453 F.3d 1151, 1154 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action because Berdeaux failed to establish that the court had personal jurisdiction over defendants. See Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 800, 802-03 (9th Cir. 2004) (stating that “the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that jurisdiction is appropriate,” and setting forth test for specific personal jurisdiction).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tammy BERDEAUX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Susan MANNING, Instructor for the University of Wisconsin-Stout in Her Official and Individual Capacity; Nathan Kirkman, Judicial Officer for University of Wisconsin-Stout in His Official and Individual Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished