U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Piedad Perez Pertuz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Piedad Perez Pertuz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 13, 2010 · Silverman, Callahan, Smith
399 F. App'x 290

Counsel

Piedad Del Carmen Perez Pertuz, Glendale, CA, pro se., John D. Williams, Esquire, Julia Tyler, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, HI-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu, HI, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Piedad Perez Pertuz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Piedad del Carmen Perez Pertuz, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez Pertuz’s July 3, 2008, motion to reopen as number-barred, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings), and Perez Pertuz has not met any of the exceptions to the number bar, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.