Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald Mathis
Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald Mathis
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Robert Rosebrock appeals the district court’s denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against Veterans Administration officials in his action alleging viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir. 2008); see Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 129 S.Ct. 365, 374, 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, Inc., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review). We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the preliminary injunction.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Robert ROSEBROCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald MATHIS, Chief of Police of the Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, in His Official Capacity and Donna Beiter, Director of the Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, in Her Official Capacity, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished