United States v. Tyree Rowe
United States v. Tyree Rowe
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Tyree Allan Rowe appeals from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Rowe contends that his sentence, which is the statutory maximum, is substantively unreasonable given the non-criminal nature of his violations. The record reflects that the district court did not procedurally err and that, in light of the totality of the circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion because the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 991-93 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyree Allan ROWE, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished