United States v. Jacinto Perez-Ortiz
United States v. Jacinto Perez-Ortiz
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 29 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10445 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-cr-00351-RCC v. MEMORANDUM * JACINTO PEREZ-ORTIZ, a.k.a. Jacinto Ortiz Perez, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 19, 2010 ** Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Jacinto Perez-Ortiz appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Perez-Ortiz’s counsel has
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 09-10445
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.