United States v. Troy Brimm
United States v. Troy Brimm
Opinion
FILED OCT 29 2010 NOT FOR PUBLICATION MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 09-10460 09-10461 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 1:99-cr-05342-OWW v. 1:96-cr-05180-OWW
TROY DOUGLAS BRIMM, MEMORANDUM *
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 19, 2010 **
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Troy Douglas Brimm appeals from the amended judgment imposing a six-
month sentence following revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Brimm’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We
have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. We construe the letter filed on June 11, 2010, as a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 09-10460
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished