Francis v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Benner v. DeJoy (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2021)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
*234 MEMORANDUM **
Louis Francis appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking to compel an inquiry by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) into the Los Angeles Police Department’s refusal to conduct a homicide investigation after Francis’s brother disappeared. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Robinson v. United States, 586 F.3d 683, 685 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the Administrative Procedure Act claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because Francis failed, to rebut the presumption that the FBI’s decision not to conduct an investigation is immune from judicial review. See Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-33, 105 S.Ct. 1649, 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985).
We do not consider Francis’s contention concerning the consent decree, because it was raised for the first time on appeal and consideration is not necessary to prevent “manifest injustice.” Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. ConocoPhillips Co., 546 F.3d 1142, 1146 (9th Cir. 2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.