United States v. Susan Barker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Susan Barker

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10138

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:06-CR-01877-CKJ v.

MEMORANDUM * SUSAN ELAINE BARKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 6, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Susan Elaine Barker appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking her supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Barker’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

**

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 09-10138

Reference

Status
Unpublished