United States v. Susan Barker
United States v. Susan Barker
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 07 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10138 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:06-CR-01877-CKJ v. MEMORANDUM * SUSAN ELAINE BARKER, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 6, 2010 ** Before: GOODWIN, RYMER, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Susan Elaine Barker appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking her supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Barker’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 09-10138
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.