James Dovenberg v. United States
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chavez v. United States (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2023)
- Alfredo Esquivel v. United States (9th Cir. 2021)
- Woodward Stuckart, LLC v. United States (District Court, D. Oregon 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
James Dovenberg appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his suit against the United States and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). As the facts are known to the parties, we repeat them here only as necessary to explain our decision.
Dovenberg’s complaint challenges broadly the government’s allegedly negligent training, supervision, and instruction of Forest Service personnel working on Dovenberg’s land while fighting and remediating damage from the 14,000-acre Shake Table Complex wildfire in 2006. Decisions regarding the training and supervision of government employees “fall squarely within the discretionary function exception” to the Federal Tort Claims Act, Nurse v. United States, 226 F.3d 996, 1001 (9th Cir. 2000), as does the Forest Service’s choice of how to fight a wildfire, see Miller v. United States, 163 F.3d 591, 595-96 (9th Cir. 1998). Dovenberg’s claims against the *150 government are therefore barred. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a).
The district court’s grant of the government’s motion to dismiss is
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.