U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi

United States v. Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 29, 2010

United States v. Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 29 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50135 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:05-cr-00538-GT-1 v. MEMORANDUM * MOISES RAMIREZ-ACOLTZI, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gordon Thompson, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted December 14, 2010 San Francisco, California Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Moises Ramirez-Acoltzi appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon his revocation.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

Ramirez-Acolotzi contends that the supervised release revocation procedures set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Ramirez-Acoltzi concedes, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Santana, 526 F.3d 1257, 1262 (9th Cir. 2008), and he raises it only to preserve the issue for further review.

AFFIRMED.

2 10-50135

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.