U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Clemente Pulido-jauregui

United States v. Clemente Pulido-jauregui
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 15, 2010 · Rymer, McKeown, Paez
375 F. App'x 798

United States v. Clemente Pulido-jauregui

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Clemente Moisés Pulido-Jauregui appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Pulido-Jauregui contends, among other things, that the district court erred by applying a 16-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A) because his prior conviction for assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111, does not constitute a crime of violence. We are precluded from reaching the merits of Pulido-Jauregui’s claims by the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir. 2007); see also United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc).

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

The government’s motion for judicial notice is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.