U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Rodolfo Cervantes-maldonado

United States v. Rodolfo Cervantes-maldonado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 15, 2010 · Rymer, McKeown, Paez
375 F. App'x 790

United States v. Rodolfo Cervantes-maldonado

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rodolfo Cervantes-Maldonado appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Cervantes-Maldonado’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cervantes-Maldonado the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.