Singh v. Holder
Singh v. Holder
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
*764 Gurjeet Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his third motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
In his opening brief, Singh fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s determinations that the motion to reopen failed to qualify for an exception to the regulatory time and numerical filing limitations, and failed to establish grounds for equitable tolling. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.