U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Sinclair Oil Corp. v. OneOK Energy Services Co.

Sinclair Oil Corp. v. OneOK Energy Services Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2010 · Rymer, McKeown, Paez
377 F. App'x 622

Counsel

Third Floor South, Jones Vargas, Las Vegas, NV, Melvin Goldstein, Matthew A. Corcoran, Esq., Goldstein & Associates, Washington, DC, Richard E. Day, Esq., Williams Porter Day & Neville, Casper, WY, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Amelia A. Fogelman, Esq., Oliver S. Howard, Esq., Thomas Kirby, Esq., Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, OK, Thomas F. Reese, Esq., Casper, WY, for Defendant-Appel-lee.

Sinclair Oil Corp. v. OneOK Energy Services Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sinclair Oil Corporation appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing its *623 action as barred by the Filed Rate Doctrine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. In light of defendant OneOK Energy Services Company, L.P.’s agreement that this case should be remanded following E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp., 503 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir. 2007), we reverse and remand.

As the parties agreed in an October 22, 2009 filing, they shall bear their own costs on appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.