U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Jose Garcia-lopez

United States v. Jose Garcia-lopez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2010 · Rymer, McKeown, Paez
377 F. App'x 614

United States v. Jose Garcia-lopez

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Garcia-Lopez appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of methamphetamine and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (B)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.