United States v. Joey Clark
United States v. Joey Clark
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 21 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10089 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-CR-00077-PMP v. MEMORANDUM * JOEY DESHAUN CLARK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 5, 2010 **
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Joey Deshaun Clark appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Clark’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. Clark’s letter, received on March 10, 2010, is deemed filed. We construe the letter as a pro se supplemental brief.
No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
2 09-10089
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.