U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Joey Clark

United States v. Joey Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 21, 2010

United States v. Joey Clark

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 21 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10089 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-CR-00077-PMP v. MEMORANDUM * JOEY DESHAUN CLARK, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 5, 2010 **

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Joey Deshaun Clark appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 70-month sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

§§ 922(g)(1) & 924(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Clark’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. Clark’s letter, received on March 10, 2010, is deemed filed. We construe the letter as a pro se supplemental brief.

No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 09-10089

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.