Idrisa Sesay v. Michael Chertoff

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IDRISA SESAY, No. 08-56812

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-02354-JM-LSP v. JANET NAPOLITANO,* Secretary of the ORDER Department of Homeland Security; ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General of the United States; ROBIN BAKER, Director of San Diego Field Office, U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement; JOHN A. GARZON, Officer-in-Charge,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted August 5, 2009 Pasadena, California

Before: CANBY, WARDLAW and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

The government’s motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground of mootness is GRANTED. See Clark v. Martinez, 543 U.S. 371, 376 n.3 (2005) Rodriguez v. Hayes, 578 F.3d 1032, 1044 (9th Cir. 2009); Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773, 776 (9th Cir. 1991). This appeal is dismissed as moot.

Because this mootness was caused by the unilateral act of the government, we vacate the decision of the district court and remand with instructions to dismiss the petition as moot. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 U.S. 18, 25 (1994) (stating that equitable considerations favor vacatur “when mootness results from unilateral action of the party who prevailed below”); see also Alvarez v. Smith, ___ U.S. ___, 2009 WL 4573274, at *5-7 (U.S. Dec. 8, 2009).

APPEAL DISMISSED; REMANDED with instructions.