MEMORANDUM **

Shrun Lata, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdic *932 tion under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and de novo claims of due process violations. Singh v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Lata’s motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed more than two years after the BIA’s prior order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Lata failed to demonstrate changed circumstances arising in Fiji, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii), or establish grounds for equitable tolling, see Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003) (equitable tolling is available “when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud, or error,” as long as the petitioner acted with due diligence).

Lata’s due process claim is unavailing.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.