U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Duran-Ramirez v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 19, 2010 · Beezer, Trott, Bybee

362 F. App'x 726

Counsel

Marco Duran-Ramirez, Fontana, CA, pro se., Stacy Stiffel Paddack, Kurt B. Larson, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Marco Duran-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir. 2007), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Duran-Ramirez’s motion to reopen as untimely because it was not filed within 90 days of the BIA’s final decision on his underlying appeal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Duran-Ramirez failed to establish that he acted with the due diligence required for equitable tolling, see Singh, 491 F.3d at 1096-97.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.