Metko v. Social Security Administration
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Auston v. Commissioner of Social Security (District Court, W.D. Washington 2025)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Maria Metko appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing her action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Social Security Act (“SSA”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kildare v. Saenz, 325 F.3d 1078, 1082 (9th Cir. 2003), and we affirm.
The district court properly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Metko failed to exhaust her administrative remedies before filing this action. See id. at 1082-86 (affirming dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction where plaintiffs failed to exhaust administrative remedies under the SSA). We construe the dismissal as without prejudice. See O’Guinn v. Lovelock Corr. Ctr., 502 F.3d 1056, 1063 (9th Cir. 2007) (concluding that dismissal without prejudice is proper where plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies).
Metko’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.