U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Annette Bender

United States v. Annette Bender
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 25, 2010

United States v. Annette Bender

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 25 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50288 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00243-RGK v. MEMORANDUM * ANNETTE BENDER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 11, 2010 ** Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Annette Bender appeals from her guilty-plea conviction and 84-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(iii).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sko/Research Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bender’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

sko/Research 2 08-50288

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.