U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

United States v. Camey-Alvarado

United States v. Camey-Alvarado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 26, 2010 · Beezer, Trott, Bybee
362 F. App'x 888

United States v. Camey-Alvarado

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Antonio Camey-Alvarado appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed fol *889 lowing his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Camey-Alvarado contends that the district court erred when it determined that he was not eligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). We are precluded from reaching the merits of this claim by the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958-59 (9th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Jacobo Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.