U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Negrete Rosila v. Holder

Negrete Rosila v. Holder
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 26, 2010 · Fernandez, Gould, Smith
368 F. App'x 746

Negrete Rosila v. Holder

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pablo Negrete Rosila and Ma. Magdalena Garcia Alvarez, spouses and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir. 2008), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen where the new evidence they presented did not support prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir. 2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.