FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 04 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50421 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00814-GAF v. MEMORANDUM * ROOSEVELT ROY NEWTON, AKA SEAL B, AKA Birdman, AKA Bird, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 16, 2010 ** Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Roosevelt Roy Newton appeals from the denial of his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduced sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SR/Research 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Newton’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

SR/Research 2 08-50421