Bhagtana v. Holder
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 23 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PARMINDER SINGH BHAGTANA, No. 07-71631
Petitioner, Agency No. A096-152-279 v.
MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted March 12, 2010 San Francisco, California
Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Parminder Singh Bhagtana, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.
The BIA determined that Bhagtana’s failure to submit his fingerprints by the deadline imposed by the IJ was sufficient reason to deny his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.47(c). The agency, however, did not have the benefit of our intervening decision in Cui v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 1289 (9th Cir. 2008), which held that refusing to continue proceedings for fingerprint processing may be an abuse of discretion. We remand for the agency to reconsider its denial of Bhagtana’s application in light of Cui. See id. at 1292-95; see also Karapetyan v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 1118, 1129-32 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED, REMANDED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.