U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2010

Binford v. Benda

Binford v. Benda
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 30, 2010 · Schroeder, Pregerson, Rawlinson
372 F. App'x 766

Binford v. Benda

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Bobby Laythen Binford, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his civil rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm the summary judgment for the reasons *767 stated in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendations entered on June 29, 2007, and adopted by the district court on July 27, 2007, 2007 WL 2193756.

We do not consider Binford’s claims that were not properly raised below. See Dodd v. Hood River County, 59 F.3d 852, 863 (9th Cir. 1995).

Binford’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.