United States v. Tomas Gonzalez Roldan
United States v. Tomas Gonzalez Roldan
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 31 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-30307 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00271-EJL v. MEMORANDUM * TOMAS GONZALEZ ROLDAN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judge, Presiding Submitted March 16, 2010 ** Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Tomas Gonzalez Roldan appeals from his jury-trial conviction and concurrent 120-month sentences for conspiracy and attempted distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)(A), 846; and possession * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). sko/Research with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)(A), (b)(1)(A).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez Roldan’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed, however the government has filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Roldan’s pro se motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
sko/Research 2 08-30307
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.