United States v. Masaioshy Sallem
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 31 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10080
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 1:08-cr-00017-2-ARM v.
MEMORANDUM * MASAIOSHY DAIKICHI SALLEM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Northern Mariana Islands
Alex R. Munson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 16, 2010 **
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Masaioshy Daikichi Sallem appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 21-month sentence for conspiracy to sell government property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 & 641, and unauthorized sale of government property, in violation
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. of 18 U.S.C. § 641. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Sallem’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
DAT/Research 2 09-10080
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.